0000. Journey Into Slides

A short introduction into the project releases you will see here showcasing the research of LERA.

At LERA, we will be taking a spectacular look at the mundane, and a boring look at the extravagant. Our work is in simplifying research on available holistic health ideas, and in codifying subjects which are not yet testable by average practitioners.

We can do a deep dive into something as mundane as whether one could or should be standing in a different way. Perhaps, self-regulation of posture is something that could come up as a key element in someone’s protocol (or perhaps not—perhaps it less than a percent of people for whom such an idea could be important).

On the other hand, we can make something extravagant sounding (everything Chris Shades says and offers, for example) and generate simple research conclusions from it. For what percentage of people did the Detox Cube test as a sufficient protocol (note just a good one) to resolve an energy pattern imbalance—and how did this solution compare to a couple dozen others?

The center of this “show me the money” pull rather than “let’s talk about what seems right to us and try to apply data from papers in the peer reviewed literature body that aren’t directly applicable to our situations,” is, in fact, not our testing method (which is unique), but our slides.

Slides for a new time

Who wants slides for a food allergy kit? Of course, the average testing practitioner (in muscle testing, biofeedback, and other practitioner fields) consider this matter primary. Generally, diet selection becomes a simple matter with these: eggs, no. Wheat, no. Dairy, yes, in some forms. A hundred arm pulls later, and you should have a good idea as to whether what you are eating is beneficial.

But what if you want to go further?

Our diet testing modules, coming out of our Quantum Diet panel (project 2), test, for example, different chemicals found in food for the purpose of seeing whether being selective with diet in regard to the avoidance of such chemicals (rather than resolving toxicological stress through support of detoxification systems while still eating the same things) is an important protocol. One of the modules takes an extensive look at the relevance of claims of harms of packaging (we will be able to see whether BPA lined cans, aluminum, etc. are an important thing to take on). This would allow a person for whom this is an issue get a note right away: “hey, exposure to BPA came up for you—is there anywhere you could be still eating foods exposed to BPA?” Another module compares all diets. Meaning, you will have a slide that tests whether the carnivore diet is seen by the body is beneficial (several, actually, differentiating the Bear’s teachings from Saladino’s or Mikhaila Peterson’s), and a slide for Medical Medium’s dietary advice. Dean Ornish’s diet is included, and basically dozen of common ideas.

The diet module goes further. Are there animal-based foods that test extremely positive for you right now. Are there plant-based-food-nerd foods that test extremely beneficial. One module is devoted to the matter of how important it is to eat organic, and another focuses on getting essential nutrients through diet.

The information we get from these slides, though, is not a binary. We, in the diet selection module, will likely show benefit from numerous diets. And, upon differentiation, we might find that selecting a diet, itself (the idea we need to make a diet change) does not even test as important! Or, perhaps, it does (giving much needed evidence to the camps suggesting toxin exposure largely comes from food, and that diet is the way out of it—a conclusion not supported by our testing in around 85% of cases).

Our slides (which we make to test all variables—even thoughts, or exercise programs) allow us to not only harmonize information into a testing format that makes it immediately practical (even a random idea, like “chamomile helps relax you,” can be tested for effect and relevance, and can be made a practical part of a protocol, even in the cases where the practitioner would never think to offer such a protocol), but do so in a way that allows their use to be highly contextualized.

A recommendation for a specific vitamin protocol might be contextualized with the following information. We need to see the data of the response to the protocol. We need to understand the underlying causes of imbalance. We need to know what pattern of imbalance we are seeing in the body (and what result we are looking for in choosing a protocol). And, we need, upon follow-up, to test the durability of the impact, and whether the impact (that we were looking for) was achieved at all.

Protocols need to be contextualized based on patient preferences as well. A patient might like herbs, not like supplements, and have a budget of $300 per month. A person might hate nutrition or dietary changes, or love them. A person might be vegan.

Rather than railroad someone into the belief that it is “my way or the highway,” or that one intellectually achieved truth matters over another, we instead invite patients to explore, joyfully, the cornucopia of options in the holistic world, with peace. We coach the patient to make selections based on the best available information that can be applied in a reasonable way, given their specific needs, and that feel comfortable for them (where comfort is necessary).

Protocols can therefore, based on context, be skipped, even though they test well: what is the point of offering an expensive protocol to one who can’t pay their bills, or a complicated protocol to one who wants to keep things simple, or a protocol using homeopathics to one who laughs at the idea.

Slides make the difference. They allow us to create an infinite library.

The Infinite Library

Starting here is a library of our research projects, built upon the foundation of a growing library of slides allowing us to test all things. Paid subscribers will see full research results; free subscribers will get updates on all the studies we do, see introductory results, and listen to a talk on the content. The free portions are generally appropriate for clients and a general audience; the paid content is generally appropriate to practitioners who will seek to make use of this information. So if you’re on a personal journey, it is strongly suggested not to spend time grasping for knowledge, when the knowledge needed has already been given to you. Instead, you should gain a basic understanding of why a subject works, integrate it, and focus on your experience with it. If it becomes remarkably impactful, such that you then want to go teach others about it, then check out the research results—but don’t defy the gift of natural experience and your own innate capacity for observation.

The divide between free and paid programs is indicative of the overall nature of our program.

The Structure Of Each Program

With each project, we produce the following elements. If one is a student wanting to learn a test an issue, they can follow them in order. This will give them appropriate backdrop and knowledge of people’s stories with a subject, scientific studies, general information, etc. to be able to talk about it, as well as the more advanced and clinically relevant structure of knowledge, wherein there is a large focus, for example, on three month impact expectations of different protocols, and lists of the top items that tested as important, in order.

Between the basic introductory content, and the advanced, conclusory content, is your own experience. You will take the slides, do learning exercises, chart your own results, find them in your own natural way, and then see the research conclusions to see what you found that matched what was published, and what strayed. This helps create a growing body of honest research and researchers when it comes to the offering of keys to the doors of protocol pathways in the holistic landscape.

So, they are meant to be followed in order, for the student. But existing practitioners can start at 9 and 10 before downloading slides and practicing, potentially, and clients can focus on the intro content (1, 2, and 3).

1. An E-book or opening article. This is to allow one, having no familiarity in a theme’s applications, gain enough knowledge to be able to trust in the relevance of the pathway’s application to them.

2. A talk. Freely available, these talks (found on our podcast, and here), gently introduce the subject a little bit further, allowing our brains to be able to engage with teachings, rather than just think about them (the difference been driving a car in a video game, and learning the stories of those who have driven the car in real life).

3. Micro Notes. The Notes blog, generally found in social media posts, posts the stunning conclusions of the minor notes of our research that accentuate the importance of the theme.

4. Testing slides. A list of positive and negative slides practitioners will use in their own testing.

5. A testing course. Notes on how to apply the theme in a testing session (using the four different methods our testing courses teach).

6. Basic Profile assessments. A look at where, in our introductory assessment of overall energy coherence, a subject is most impacting us.

7. Advanced Profile assessments. A look at where, in our ten layers of energy patterns, a subject is most impacting us.

8. Comprehensive Profile assessments. A look at where, in our twelve layer meridian field mapping, a subject is most impacting us.

9. Practitioner Summary. Summarizes results of findings from all testing slides used

10. Research Article / Substack / Data blog. Goes over the data of our findings from six categories of assessment. These include things like notes on demographics most impacted, notes on responses to all slides, etc.

These ten portions, obviously, are geared for students of muscle testing wanting to be able to engage, exploratively, in the study of any concept.

The Four Testing Courses

Testing starts right at home.

Our first course focuses on self-testing. You will be able to take a slide kit (slides are printed out for free), and using our laser enhanced exposure platform (LERA), you will expose slides to yourself and see what you respond to the most. This opens up a great practice phase, where you can practice and explore techniques and subjects—before starting to work with clients.

Our second course focuses on muscle testing. Muscle testing practitioners learn to test slides, assess different dynamics of energy patterns, etc.

Our third course focuses on distance testing. You will learn to test someone right from the comfort of your own house, giving you, also, the freedom to explore (practice testing) different subjects you are learning.

The fourth course focuses on comparative analytics. More or less, a short lecture on how you create your own research project and carry it out in an ethical way, this program focuses on not just testing one person at a distance, but hundreds (in a way that doesn’t impact them, using our non-deep exposure pathway, rather than other mechanisms of exposure claiming to offer a distance healing effect.

Why This Matters

You, certainly, don’t need to be a practitioner in this artform, or any other. You can simply read about the basics, or listen to the podcasts on what we found, or check out our notes blog, or look at our data posts (here).

The point is, we’ve made basic content available to promote accessibility of radical concepts, and we’ve made advanced content available to allow practitioners to glance through our research conclusions, mechanisms of our studies, demographic findings, etc. very rapidly so as not to waste time.

To summarize, we’ve made a program that can work with your needs, wherever you are on the learning style spectrum.

Welcome.

Disclaimer: Please see our disclaimer. All results are non-medical and are based on non-medical information. We want to see what happens to one’s biophoton field patterning—not what heals them.